Thank You for Smoking Essay -- Peter Brimelow Tobacco Health Essays

Thank You for SmokingTake another drag. Thats hefty for you. One might not hear that everyday, but cocksucker Brimelows Thank You for Smoking? is a very well create verbally deductive argument that may have you believing that statement by the judgment of conviction youre done reading his article. Brimelows argument is clear inductive because he presents his samples right away which lead to generalizations that are worn from those examples (McFadden). Brimelow comes right out early in the argument and informs the reader have can be beneficial to ones health (141). Brimelow makes it all the way evident throughout the article that smoking is good for ones health which is his major claim. The major claim is also known as a thesis (McFadden). Because most Americans have heard repetitively from the time they were little that smoking is bad for your health, Brimelow needs to provide valuable instruction to sway his audience. In this argument, he does a really good ruminate o f doing just that. Brimelow uses grounds, which are evidence and facts that support the major claim, to back up his argument (McFadden 2003) Parkinsons disease among smokers appears to be half the rate of non-smokers. Alzheimers disease has been found to be as much as 50% less among smokers than non-smokers. Smoking may be responsible for what appears to be a 50% lower rate of prostate cancer among smokers (142). These were a a a few(prenominal)(prenominal) of the statistics Brimelow provided to show how smoking may help prevent certain diseases. He didnt stop there. On page 141 Brimelow documented the outcome of studies performed by D.M. Warburton that showed cigarettes to stimulate alertness, dexterity, and cognitive capacity. These grounds presented by Brimelow attract the audience... ...ke away from the cater of Brimelows argument.Overall, Brimelow has a strong argument going here. He understandably has stated his claim and has strengthened it with powerful grounds, warrants, and backing. He exhibited skill in providing qualifiers and bringing up rebuttals and counter-claims. Brimelow falls short in a few areas of the argument. By using many fallacies and hasty generalizations Brimelow takes away from his strong argument. With some modifications in a few areas Brimelow would have a very good argument.Works CitedBrimelow, Peter, Thank You for Smoking...? The Genre of Argument Ed. Irene L. Clark capital of Massachusetts Thomson/Heinle, 1998. 141-143Clark, Irene L. The Genre of an Argument. Boston Thomson/Heinle, 1998.McFadden, James. The Toulmin Method From Classical Logic toModern Argumentation. 2003. Buena Vista University. Storm Lake, IA