A Comparison of the Carbon Footprint of Retail Stores Patagonia, H&M, and The Wardrobe :: Global Warming Climate Change Carbon Emissions

argon you worried about global climate change? Have you ever so wondered how you contri exclusivelye to this problem? What about the impact of the clothes you buy? We endure put together estimated information from three different types of stores to help you put one across options you give birth as consumers to be more green. Patagonia is an example of an environmentally cognizant and globally active store. The same is true for H&M but it aims to provide affordable, fashionable clothing at the same time. The Wardrobe in Davis, California is an example of a local store, community built and owned.It is definitive to consider the environmental impact of the stores you support and the clothes you buy. Local stores have the lowest impact because their transportation needs are less than those of stores per centum of a chain. However, although larger stores may emit more carbon only if because they are bigger, some are committed to cutting down on their carbon footprint. CARBON F OOTPRINTSPatagonia303.66 loads carbonic acid gas/yrH&M261,376.75 dozens CO2/yrThe Wardrobe54.13 tons CO2/yrPatagoniaPatagonias Carbon footprint of 303.66 tons of CO2 per year was calculated from estimating the lights in each store to 40.89 tons of CO2 (13%) from the electricity for 47 cogency saver bulbs, and 182.85 tons of CO2 (61%) from electricity for 100 fluorescent organ pipe lights, 71 tons of CO2 (23%) from the fuels burned for shipping to the stores from the distribution center, 8.23 tons of CO2 (3%) from the fuels burned for shipping clothes from the distribution center to the European stores by sea freight, and 1.3 tons of CO2 (H&MH&M calculated it emitted 73,593.61 tons of CO2 to power its buildings (28%), 161,273.66 tons of CO2 for transportation of its clothing (62%), 23,517.81 tons of CO2 for business travel (9%), and 2,991.67 tons for fuel for its company cars (1%). The WardrobeThe Wardrobes footprint of 54.13 tons of CO2 per year was calculated using the 4.81 tons of CO2 (9%) from electricity for their four setting computers, 0.99 tons CO2 (2%) from electricity for the 11 show lights kept illumine 24 hours a day, everyday, 1.31 tons of CO2 (2%) from electricity for the 47 lights sullen on during store hours equalling 52 hours a week, 6.