'Carl Gustav Jung Essay\r'

'In this es theorise I ordain aim to demonstrate an thought of Jung’s disposition Types by describing and evaluating his supposition and try erupt how they might be useful in attending me to determine sanative goals. I pull up stakes too look at close to of the criticism levelled at Jung’s theory,I sound off this allows the therapist,ie my egotism to better infer the positive from the prejudicious. I am also of the opinion that detailing Jung’s in addition soon historic period and background play am crucial role in the overall evaluation. I shoot useicular interestingness in when Jung met Freud and how this meeting of mentalitys wrought or whitethornbe changed their individual conclusions. I go out cover this later in my essay.\r\nCarl Gustav Jung was born July 26, 1875, in the small Swiss village of Kessewil. His father was capital of Minnesota Jung, a country par tidings, and his mother was Emilie Preiswerk Jung. He was encircled by a fa irly well meliorate ex hightail ited family, including quite a few clergymen and some eccentrics as well. By the age of just half a dozen years old Jung started to get a line Latin which started an interest in language and literature, e specially ancient literature. Jung read several ancient languages including ‘Sanskrit’ the original Holy Hindoo language book. Jung was a distant youth whilst development up who did non enjoy his schooling years and was not competitive. Jung’s later education was in Basel, Switzerland where he attended boarding school where he found himself the centre of jealous pestering.\r\nCarl Jung began to use distemper as an excuse, developing an embarrassing movement to croak under pressure. Carl Jung’s first c areer woof was archaeology; Jung went on to study medicine at the University of Basel. Whilst pass watering under the well-kn throw neurologist Krafft-Ebing, he established himself on psychiatry as his career. by a nd by graduating, he took a place at the Burghoeltzli moral Hospital in Zurich under Eugene Bleuler, an expert on schizophrenia. In 1903, Jung married Emma Rauschenbach. He also taught classes at the University of Zurich, had a private practice, and invented word association at this prison term. (internet search)\r\nIn 1907 Jung met Freud. Freud would be seduced by the esteem and nature of Jung and would soon collect in him the spiritual son that could guarantee the survival of psychoanalysis. The un impartingness of Jung towards the Freudian hypothesis referred to the role of sexuality in the mental development. In fact Jung on no occasion only embraced the sexual theory of Freud. From 1912 onwards Jung found himself more(prenominal)(prenominal) and more distant from Freud’s writings. By abandoning the copious and indirect of Psycho-sexuality, Jung would launch himself in the fields of church property and science which was understood by only an initiated few.\r\n Jung’s inner adult male became something for him to study and develop his theories on and during this time Jung evolved the goal of his psychology of individuation, which is the deliver the goodsment of the self and other guide marks, such as the arche guinea pigs, the incarnate unconscious mind. Jung’s theory stresses the magnificence of pull ining our accept(prenominal) unconsciousness (events, vox populi, behaviour radiation diagrams that we contain buried in our subconscious from our own direct past) and the collective unconscious (patterns, trends, propertys, behaviours that all homos have no proceeds what background or culture have caterpillar track by means of our lives). Whereas Freud believed the unconscious was suppressed by the human intellect. Jung in the other hand believed the unconscious forefront was where the conscious mind had its origins and where our somebody start outs or is created from.\r\n ratio wheel was the key for Jung, w hich he believed the balancing of the both sides is what drives us humans ‘towards’ or ‘a focal point’ from goals. The foundation of the mind that consisted of the EGO (who we think we are); the SHADOW (the part of us that we deny or do not ac intimacy) was real by Jung. He continued to believe our mind was constantly developing or moving towards our sure self (individuation) and this tour was fuelled by natural laws, the principles of enemys, that all aspect of our mind has an opposite force. The principle of equivalence that equal joins of qualification are cut inton to both sides, and the principle of entropy, that everything natural winds down as energy is evenly distributed, eventually with the opposing side amalgamate together creating a harmony.\r\nJung believed that our mind’s sail followed a repeating in the ‘rites of passage’ for birth, espousals and death, mirrored finishedout all cultures and packs. Jung believ ed that this drive to shine towards a state if harmony or individuation, was essentially important to us all. Jung spent a wakeless deal of time and energy on the importance of dreams and getting to understand what their meanings meant to each individual. Jung believed that by understanding the imageries within our dreams we would benefit a better knowledge of ourselves. He indicated that dreams should not be interpreted too accurately, but considered for finding ad hominem meanings in the fanciful or symbolism.\r\nJung also recognised and identify two opposites of individualality;\r\n1. INTROVERSION\r\n2. EXTROVERSION\r\n intussusception †when psychic energy is off-key inwards towards our inner world. These plenty tend to be thoughtful people with taciturn natures, preferring their own company and evading large groups, they may be cautious and uncertain, disliking change or impudently things, they may seem defensive and they ilk privacy and psycheal space and spend a lot of time in contemplation. Extreme reverberates of introversion have standardised qualities to autism and some forms of schizophrenia.\r\nExtroversion †is when the movement of energy is turned outwards towards the outside world. An extroverted individual would show interest in the outside world, they will be objective and frank with helpful and piano-going mortalalities, they like satisfy and people round them, extreme versions of extroverts would be despairing al ane and not able to bear suppress or solitude, needing continuous excitement and external breathing in to prevent boredom or unhappiness.\r\nJung also identified intravenous feeding different run lows (attitudes) of the mind;\r\nTHINKING †when a person connects to the world via reason and intelligence. These types will have thinking searching minds, always questioning. They will be good at judging things able to see the origin and results, and will reach logical decisions. They may be open and a ppear cool and unaffectionate emotionally, and will be good at adjusting to new situations.\r\nFEELING †when a person makes worth decisions close the world found on how they feel near something, putting ideas, points, and issues in come in based on how they valuate them and not on emotional feelings. liveliness people have a sturdy scent out of traditional values and human connection is crucial to them as they tend to be warm and creative.\r\n maven †when a person relies sensory feelings †perceptions. These people depose on sensory impressions, how certain things appear, feel and sound. They tend to be mentally and emotionally stable people, fetching things at face value, they can be seen as dull and boring which often be belatedly going and fun, with a calm nature.\r\nINTUITION †when the world is understood or interpreted in a particular way chiefly through the unconscious †when people speak of having a hunch, gut feeling or instinct about somet hing, this type of person is conscious of changes. Possibilities can appear distracted or ungrounded; they will get bored of uninterested or boring details which are often not practical. They can be creative and inspirational.\r\nJung believed that a person is essentially an introvert or an extrovert and this frame equally fixed, however, an individual will rely mainly on functioning using one of these four modalities but that opposing function also had an impression on their relationships and behaviour and these functions may adjust throughout life. He combined two attributes and the four functions to eightsome different psychological types. Jung understood that most people are a blend of two or more types, and that understanding how your own genius type and that of people somewhat you related to the world would purpose a deeper understanding of yourself. For example; bringing you nearer to individuation. Jung trusts that we understand and recognised the strengths and weaknes ses of our mind; that we would improve and achieve balance. The functions and attitudes are also not fixed with one side of the pair leading, the other becomes unconscious. Jung believed that the unconscious part then finds a way of expressing its hidden self. A person’s conscious orientation will be towards one of the four functions; the leading or principle function †this will decide how you move to experiences.\r\n1.The dominant or principle function †this will determine how you react to experiences.\r\n2. Auxiliary functions †mainly conscious.\r\n3. The opposite auxiliary †suppressed and partially unconscious.\r\n4. Remaining loosely unconscious\r\nJung believed when the conscious function was solid in that respect was a trend for the opposing function to check up on through into the conscious occasionally in the form of hysteria, phobias and obsessions. He believed in order to achieve balance one must work with the repressed function in therapy whi ch in this case has echoed Freud’s theory on repressed feelings and emotions surfacing unconsciously.\r\nThese combinations of psychological types, Jung theorise into eight types, combining the two attitudes with the four functions;\r\n extravertive and draw ined\r\n1.Thinking Type,\r\n2.Feeling Type,\r\n3.Sensation Type,\r\n4.Intuitive Type\r\nThe above generalisation was Jung’s way of providing a structure in order to begin and to understand individual’s behaviours and feelings. Although these types are still current they form the basis of spirit or psychometric testing (Myers-Briggs) which is still in use today. I believe the significance of this training is that it is an opening point from which to discover and research our own or clients mind using a structure.\r\nJung maintains that psychological types are mostly inborn and not acquired through life’s experiences. I concur with this belief, However, Jung recognised that personality types were i nfluenced as a child advances through life by factors such as parents and the get along of influence each parent has over a child, and social factors such as school, peer groups surroundings. Jung also believed problems (mental ill health) arose when external influences forced children into a pattern that goes against the natural energy flow of a person’s mind or psychological type.\r\nAs with Freud, most of the theories of early pioneers are quite out(predicate) to prove or test due to no scientific way of measuring them. Also the amount of uncomplaining roles used was in very small come and little practical work was done. Jung’s work has given foundations to many modern psychologies including theories to develop and explore further and deeper, including words that have been accepted by the modern language. For example;\r\n* Psyche\r\n* Extrovert\r\n* Introvert\r\n* Archetype\r\nThese are parallels with other great psychologies †Freud, as I already mentioned and discussed, and the work of Hans Eysenck a more modern theorist. Eysenck was the first psychologist to make this character or temperament business into something more mathematical: he gave long lists of adjectives to hundreds of thousands of people and used a special statistics called factor analysis to figure out what factors trait dimensions carry the most weight. He took results of this work and created a test called the Eysenck nature Questionnaire (EPQ) instead of making these traits either-or, like Jung did, he saw them as dimensions. His first trait dimension was, like Jung, ‘extraversion-introversion’. But rather than say you were one or the other (an I or an E), he provided you a score on extraversion-introversion.\r\nEysenck based his theories on Galen, an ancient Greek theory which was created around two thousand BC. It is one of the oldest personality theories around. Eysenck added on the two basic dimensions of temperament (like Jung) and these were ba sed on four types (unscientifically based on the types of fluids he believed were lavation around the individuals body) a sanguine type, cheerful, optimistic and easy to be with, choleric, quick, hot tempered and aggressive. A unemotional type temperament, slow people who had a tendency to be sad, depressed and have a negative view of the world.\r\nMuch simpler and much less forward-looking than Jung’s theory; Eysenck expands this into three dimensions of personality;\r\n1. Introversion †extroversion\r\n2. Neuroticism †emotional\r\n3. Stability and psychoticism\r\nWith quintette further subdivisions;\r\n1. extroversion\r\n2. agreeableness\r\n3. conscientiousness\r\n4. neuroticism\r\n5. openness\r\nThe theme of four (opposing) forces repeats throughout cultures and crosswise time, North, South, East and West, Earth, Fire, Wind and Air. In religion(used my own as my example!) we see recurrences of types, for example; The Father\r\nThe watchword\r\nThe Holy Ghost or the Virgin arrive\r\nThe Crone\r\nArchetypal images we can recognise and begin to understand. These theories have a degree of objectivity, whilst they may give different labels to the personality types there does seem to be agreement that you begin to understand individuals if you can assess basic similar categories or repeating personality traits. Like Jung’s theory, and the teachings in the Bible (parables) perchance these theories have value as a way of forming a framework for us to ask question, and discovering more of ourselves.\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nJung believed each personality type or psyche was influenced by another, it is logical to assume that in all human relationships, mainly within an psychoanalyst/ longanimous relationship, the analyst may encourage the patient so a subjective conclusion or true individuation may not be achievable. I feel it is important to recognise as Jung did that these types are not fixed and that a person’s personality or psyche c hanges throughout life and that energy flows and fluctuates between the opposing sides of our psyche so we understand that a person does not fit neatly into one of the boxes. Jung created this structure or framework to help work towards understanding of our own psyches and how better to relate to the world and people around us.\r\nUnderstanding how a person or patient feels, reacts and relates is obviously the first step to the beginning to help them. Being able to plan a patient’s healing journey will be more effectively tailored to them if we have a good understanding of why they think or feel the way they do and help them to understand this too. Jung believed that in order to heal, people need to learn to listen to messages from the unconscious mind, to follow their own runway and think independently, and that in order to become a competent analyst you must ‘first understand yourself’ in order to efficiently help a client and to determine therapeutic goals,Th is is an ongoing journey of self discovery which this course is bringing out in me.\r\nBIBLIOGRAPHY\r\nChrysalis †Diploma in psychotherapeutic way †year two †Module Three\r\nCarl Jung Resources, 2014\r\nhttp://www.carl-jung.net/\r\nWhat Freud authentically said †David Stafford-Clark\r\nWWW.Philosophy.lander.edu (Internet research)\r\nWikipedia (Internet)\r\nCarl Jung †Dr. C. George Boeree\r\nhttp://worldtracker.org/media/library/psychological science/Boere\r\nHans Eysenck †Dr. C. George Boeree\r\nhttp://worldtracker.org/media/library/Psychology/Boere\r\nIntroducing Jung a graphic guide †Maggie Hyde & Michael McGuinness\r\nPersonality Types: Jung’s Model of Typology †Darl Sharp\r\n'