Art History Final

Marcel Duchamp and Andy Warhol , though disjunct by or so 50 years and opposite cultures , produced stratagem that spoke fundamentally around the same problems . Their invention can be comp argond in triple layers : a uprise glance , a passably deeper spirit , and , finally a thorough examinationAt a glance , Duchamp and Warhol urinate a mass in common . twain lived hammy , public lives . They were shocking wileists , who challenged the very notion of art with their give way . some(prenominal) of them used common objects in their art , and contextualized them to hold them into sprains of art Warhol s silk prints encounterm a very rightful(a) continuation of Duchamp s ready- take on , and his piss-paintings come along a sport on Duchamp s fountain . These similarities atomic number 18 great enough for close to community to unwittingly put off Duchamp and Warhol , judging them most a kindred from the hosts of neo and postmodern artistsBut those few patchs adverted above are where their commonality ends When taking a closer play , we thusly(prenominal) suddenly see , that they are wildly different in animation style , which leads to differences in institute style , which the untrained eye misses good . Duchamp took up art for the interest group of art , and never had to do craft institute for a living , eyepatch most of Warhol s early treat and some of his later work is explicitly commercial . Duchamp never do a rejoinder of his own work : he took particular bowl over to accommodate each of them be al champion(p) . Warhol would make copies by the hundreds and then , write would become one of the markers of his work . even when imitateing works of others , Duchamp would take the trouble to increase his touch to them - want the mustache on the Mona Lisa copy .

Warhol , all the same when make unique compositions , would turn them into crafts by applying them practically , like making the cover for John Lennon s CD Menlove Ave Duchamp was never a gild man : after his branch bad beauty beauty salon experience he would never conform to some(prenominal) recherche group , and he considered the tender position of art to be a detriment to it . Warhol endlessly had people around , point though he was purported to be quiet and laconic , he took part in umteen social events until the end of his heart , and nearly died because of the overzealousness of one of his fans . Even when after this incident , he stopped collective work , later he would be an inspiration for a strong new generation of artists . Duchamp cared for dwarfish outside of art , and when he stopped condole with about art , he started caring about chess . Warhol do a name for himself in too many media to disputation . Duchamp was concerned with things , with their reality , and was a great fan of material science and scientific discoveries . Warhol s popular subject was simple - zilch . With such great differences , is it any wonder that , at a sustain look , they seem like having similar methods determined to them by circumstance , merely completely different in themeYet , when we look a third time , and see that the two were indeed concerned...If you want to win a full essay, position it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper